AI PRE-REVIEW · EXPLAINABLE · TRACEABLE

Before submission, let an AI co-reviewer examine the full manuscript

From study design to evidentiary support, turn key issues into professional comments that are traceable, verifiable, and actionable.

Structured ReportScores, issue priorities, and revision guidance in one place
Traceable EvidenceComments linked to sections, figures, or references
Transparent LimitsInsufficient evidence is flagged; formal peer review is not replaced

* The interface is a de-identified demonstration. Actual checks depend on review type, manuscript content, and available evidence.

ScholarAI · Review WorkspaceDEMO-MANUSCRIPT · 12 / 24
DE-IDENTIFIED MANUSCRIPT · DEMO

Evaluating a Multi-stage Intervention for Research Reproducibility

Original Research · Methods & Results
12

2.3 Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome was assessed using a two-sided test. Effect size and confidence intervals were not reported.

4. Discussion

Not generic feedback — a systematic review of scholarly quality

Checks span the research question, methods, data, reasoning, and compliance so each comment can point to a concrete issue and revision action.

01

Research Question & Novelty

Assess whether the research gap, contribution boundary, and novelty claim are clear and supported by literature.

02

Study Design & Methods

Check samples, controls, variables, procedures, and reproducibility details.

03

Statistics & Data Analysis

Review statistical tests, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and alignment with the design.

04

Results & Conclusion Support

Identify conclusions that exceed the data and distinguish association, prediction, and causation.

05

Structure & Argumentation

Check the logical chain across abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion.

06

Literature & Citation Integrity

Surface inconsistent citations, possible literature gaps, and reference-format issues.

07

Figure & Data Consistency

Look for inconsistencies across text, figures, captions, and key numerical values.

08

Ethics & Reporting Requirements

Check completeness signals for ethics approval, conflicts, limitations, and applicable reporting requirements.

Coverage varies across integrated, academic, language, format, and compliance tasks. The actual report is the source of truth for completed checks.

See the most important revisions first, then work back through the manuscript

The report is not a generic paragraph. It is a prioritized revision roadmap connected to manuscript evidence.

One report, four critical answers

Where the manuscript stands, what must change first, where the evidence is, and how to revise it.

Overall assessment and recommendation
Must Fix / Suggested / Optional
Section, figure, and reference locations
Actionable guidance written for authors
View Full Sample Report

Structured Review Report · De-identified Demo

DEMO-2026-0715 · ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Major Revision
72Overall Score
2Must Fix
4Suggested
3Optional
#IssueEvidenceSuggested Action
1Main conclusion lacks effect-size supportMethods §2.3Add effect size and 95% CI; distinguish statistical and practical significance.
2Discussion overstates causalityDiscussion §4.2Narrow causal wording and discuss confounders and limitations.
3Reference fields are incompleteReference 18Verify authors, year, and DOI, then standardize the citation format.

A clear path from manuscript upload to revision roadmap

01

Upload Paper

Supports PDF, Word, LaTeX and more. Drag and drop to upload.

02

Select Service

Integrated review, language polish, formatting, compliance — flexible on-demand

03

AI Review & Quality Validation

Analyze the selected dimensions, then check evidence and score consistency.

04

Get Report

View a structured report online and revise by priority and manuscript location.

Beyond Review — A Professional Toolbox for Your Entire Submission Journey

From journal selection, writing, compliance checks to citation management — every step is equipped with precise AI-powered tools

PDF Conversion

Built for Academic Writing

Turn a PDF into editable Markdown, integrable JSON, and publication-ready XML, with a quality report and image assets included.

MarkdownEditableJSONIntegrableXMLPublication-readyQuality ReportImage Assets
Convert a PDF Now
Drop a PDF or click to upload
Papers, reports, book chapters supported
Pay per page — only for what you useDownload when ready
Journal MatcherEnter your title and abstract to get the best-matching journalsReference FormatterFill the form or paste BibTeX to generate standard citations in one clickCover LetterFill in paper info to generate a professional cover letter (auto template fallback if AI unavailable)DOI / Journal CheckPaste DOIs or references to validate them and enrich metadata via Crossref open data; also verify whether a target journal is indexed (read-only, anonymous)Submission ChecklistAuto-check pre-submission items from your Manuscript Profile. Filled items are marked ready; missing ones get quick jumps.Academic TranslationPaste text to translate between Chinese and English (returns original if AI unavailable)Abstract & KeywordsPaste a draft to extract abstract and keywords (word-frequency fallback if AI unavailable)Figure StandardsPaste figure/table captions or the manuscript body to check numbering, references and compliancePlagiarism Pre-checkHeuristic plagiarism pre-check: over-quotation, self-repetition and citation density (not authoritative)Language ProofreadingPaste an English (or Chinese) academic passage; AI polishes grammar, academic tone and expression, and lists key editsCitation ConverterThree input modes: ① DOIs (batch, one per line, fetched read-only & anonymously from Crossref); ② pasted BibTeX entries; ③ a single reference text (best-effort heuristic parse). All formatted as APA / MLA / GB-T 7714 / IEEEORCID CheckValidate ORCID iD format and checksum (pure front-end, no data sent)

Professionalism comes from transparent limits, not inflated claims

ScholarAI provides pre-submission assistance to help authors review manuscripts systematically. It does not replace editors or formal peer review.

Comments linked to evidence

Reports use sections, figures, references, or text excerpts to help authors trace each issue.

Issues organized by priority

Address research-validity issues before expression and formatting improvements.

Uncertainty stated separately

Judgments without sufficient manuscript evidence are not presented as certain conclusions.

Controlled manuscript handling

Existing transport, access, and deletion controls remain in place without exposing manuscript content in pages or logs.

Credit-based consumption. New users get 200 free credits. First review is free.